Respectful Insolence (a.k.a. Orac Knows): January 2006::
(ACAM)*—the same organization that the FTC had cited in 1998 for false or Oprah slaps down James Frey. I normally dont watch The Oprah Winfrey Show.
http://oracknows.blogspot.com/2006_01_01_archive.htmlHOME |
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Thursday hit Internet marketer Jumpstart
Technologies with a $900,000 civil fine for violating the CAN-SPAM Act, the
largest penalty to date for a violation of the two-year-old law.
According to the FTC, the San Francisco-based Jumpstart violated the law by
disguising its commercial e-mails as personal messages.
The FTC's complaint claims that Jumpstart offered free movie tickets in
exchange for the names and e-mail addresses of five or more friends in
connection with its FreeFlixTix promotion.
Fergies Tech Blog: 06/26/2005 - 07/03/2005::
The FTC alleges that Trustsoft used deceptive means to is often wrong -- with many people seeing criminal records when theyve never been in trouble.
http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/2005_06_26_archive.htmlHOME |
Engineering, Science, and Other (Pretty Clean) Jokes Collection::
On Replacing Fuses with Bullets. Corporate Down-Sizing Affects Everyone if in your journey you have found that a light bulb works for you, that is fine.
http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/humor.htmHOME |
Jumpstart then sent the friends
commercial e-mails with the consumer's e-mail address in the From line and a
seemingly personal message in the Subject line.
Jumpstart also made it appear as if the consumer had written the text of the
messages.
"These defendants intentionally used personal messages as a cover-up for
commercial messages," Lydia Parnes, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer
Protection, said in a statement. "Deceptive subject lines and headers not
only violate the CAN-SPAM Act but also consumer trust."
Pharma Marketing Blog: February 2007::
PhRMA should have a stupidity fine for any of its members who, due to their I am on record saying how courageous I thought Merck was in bucking the
http://pharmamkting.blogspot.com/2007_02_01_archive.htmlHOME |
The FTC said people received six or more e-mails urging them to join
FreeFlixTix, some containing ads for other products and services offered by
Jumpstart or its partners. When consumers attempted to opt out of the
promotional mailings, they continued receiving offers from Jumpstart for
"weeks afterward."
The FTC's complaint also claims Jumpstart engaged in deceptive advertising
by misleading consumers about the terms and conditions of the promotion.
The
offer of a free movie ticket required some consumers to submit their
credit card information to one of Jumpstart's partners and to sign up for
one of the partner's promotions.
Other Jumpstart partners required consumers to actually pay for a promotion
while others made free offers that had to be cancelled at a later date to
avoid a charge.
 Google, Telecoms Boost Techs
 Alcatel, Lucent in Merger Talks Again
| 
FTC Slaps Spammer With Record Fine 
PRINT
Add to favorites